When tests are performed, this is beneficial to the doctor as there is generally financial compensation. When a test is done, information is obtained, and the patient may benefit by feeling like he is getting quality care when a number of tests are being performed to try to “get to the bottom” of the cause of the erectile dysfunction. What we consider most important when deciding if we should do a test or not do a test is if and how it benefits the patient.
Many of these erectile dysfunction tests are invasive, and can be uncomfortable, and are not without risks. Therefore, our approach to testing is to recommend testing only when the information obtained influences decision making. If the test shows “A” we do this, and if it shows “B”, we do that.
In most patients who seek treatment of their erectile dysfunction, none of these tests are indicated, as these tests often do not influence management. For most patients, the appropriate management of erectile dysfunction is to identify the least invasive treatment that works. In general, the first treatment option that should be recommended is oral medication such as Viagra, and if an invasive test would not change that recommendation, regardless of the test result, we would not consider that test to be indicated.